ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2026
Advancing interprofessional collaboration: exploring physicians' perceptions, preferences, and barriers regarding pharmacists' roles in Jordan.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Interprofessional collaboration is crucial for improving healthcare delivery and addressing workforce challenges. Physician-pharmacist collaboration enhances patient care, improves medication management and health outcomes. While patients' perspectives have been studied, physicians' views in Jordan remain under-investigated. This study assessed physicians' perceptions, preferences, and barriers to pharmacist integration. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among practicing physicians between April 1st and September 30th, 2025. Despite an extended six-month recruitment period, severe clinical time constraints resulted in a final sample of 297 participants, representing a 21.6% shortfall from the initial target of 379 and yielding a post-hoc margin of error of 5.66%. Using a convenience sampling approach with multi-channel recruitment, the survey was distributed via professional social media networks, direct electronic contacts, and targeted in-person clinic visits. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics to summarise the variables and examine the sample characteristics. Results: The majority of physicians (95.3%) had collaborated with pharmacists, with face-to-face communication being the most preferred method (72.7%). The responding physicians generally perceived positive roles for pharmacists in advising on drug interactions (60.3%), improving patient adherence (60.3%), and adjusting medication dosages (58.9%). A significant association was observed between practice sector and physicians' perception scores ( Conclusion: Although Jordanian physicians reported positive perceptions of pharmacists' expertise, systemic barriers and traditional role boundaries appear to hinder effective practice integration. Enhancing structured communication, implementing joint interprofessional training, and enacting target healthcare policy reforms are necessary to fostering effective physician-pharmacist collaboration and improving patient care outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.