ReviewJournal of global health2026
Antenatal interventions to support newborn survival: updates for the Lives Saved Tool.
Review in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Postnatal interventions to support newborn survival: updates for the Lives Saved Tool.Journal of global health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Antenatal care strategies encompass a series of interventions delivered to expectant mothers to optimise both their health outcomes and those of their neonate. We summarise the most recent effect estimates for maternal immunisation, screening and management of infections, pre-existing chronic diseases such as hypertension and diabetes, nutrition, psychosocial interventions for smoking cessation, pre-term pre-labour rupture of membranes, administration of corticosteroids for foetal lung maturation, and induction of post-term labour. Methods: We synthesised effect estimates for antenatal and intrapartum interventions using PubMed and CENTRAL searches (2022-2023) and in consultation with a technical advisory group to determine whether and how new meta-analysed effect estimates could be incorporated into the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) model, as well as which of these estimates should be updated and which should be retained. Results: Tetanus toxoid vaccination during the antenatal period lead to a significant reduction in neonatal mortality. Antibiotics for pre-term pre-labour rupture of membranes and administration of corticosteroids for foetal lung maturation lead to significant reductions in neonatal mortality due to sepsis and prematurity, respectively. Nutritional interventions including balanced protein and energy supplementation and multiple micronutrient supplementation reduced the risks of small-for-gestational-age babies. Insecticide-treated bed-nets for malaria, antibiotic treatment of syphilis, and post-term induction of labour demonstrated significant reductions in the risks of stillbirth. The effect estimates for preterm births contributed to the LiST model for interventions including treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria, omega-3 fatty acid supplementation, calcium supplementation, and provision of low-dose aspirin for pre-eclampsia, which projected significant reductions in the risks of small-for-gestational-age babies. Conclusions: The evidence described here highlights the potential impact of implementing high-yield healthcare packages in context-specific settings to effectively improve neonatal survival. These estimates can be used as inputs to model the impact of antenatal care interventions using the LiST.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42825345What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.