Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42825351›Full record

ReviewJournal of global health2026

Postnatal interventions to support newborn survival: updates for the Lives Saved Tool.

Tyler Vaivada, Yvonne Tam, Georgia Dominguez, Li Jiang, Rachel Lee Him, Oviya Muralidharan, Davneet Sihota, Leila Harrison, Robert E Black, Zulfiqar A Bhutta

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tyler VaivadaCenter for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Yvonne TamDepartment of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Georgia DominguezCenter for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Li JiangCenter for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Rachel Lee HimCenter for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Oviya MuralidharanCenter for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Davneet SihotaCenter for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Leila HarrisonCenter for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Robert E BlackDepartment of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Zulfiqar A BhuttaCenter for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The period immediately after birth represents a highly vulnerable time for newborns, particularly in contexts without access to high-quality secondary care for small and/or sick newborns. Scaling up existing evidence-based interventions can avert much of the mortality and morbidity that occurs during the neonatal period. We summarise the evidence for interventions delivered postnatally and propose a set of effect estimates for inclusion in the Lives Saved Tool (LiST). Methods: We first conducted a set of systematic reviews and updates on the most recent evidence from randomised controlled trials on the effectiveness of interventions for reducing neonatal mortality and associated risk factors. We then assessed the evidence using standardised set of considerations alongside an iterative consultation process with newborn care experts to determine whether and how new meta-analysed effect estimates could be incorporated into the LiST model, as well as which of these estimates should be updated and which should be retained. Results: We proposed a new set of interventions that involve three packages of newborn care: a basic package (i.e. primary/community, secondary hospital care), a referral care package (i.e. tertiary care), and a package of promising innovative interventions whose evidence base is still developing. We included five new interventions within the updated LiST model's basic and referral packages: nasal continuous positive airway pressure coupled with preterm supportive care, newborn referral and transportation, animal-derived surfactant, prophylactic antifungals, and antibiotic stewardship. Three new interventions were proposed for the innovation package: magnesium sulphate for neuroprotection in asphyxiated newborns, topical emollient therapy, and probiotics/synbiotics for hospitalised preterm newborns. Conclusions: We synthesised the evidence base for the impact of a package of effective postnatal interventions for neonates for an updated LiST model. The new interventions and updated effect estimates can provide more accurate projections of potential impacts on neonatal survival for different intervention coverage scale-up scenarios in low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityPostnatal CareHumansInfant, NewbornRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicinterventionsLives Saved Tool (LiST)neonatal mortalityneonatenewborn carepostnatal

Identifiers

PMID42825351

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.