Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42827203›Full record

ReviewThe EMBO journal2026

Cellular senescence: six decades of discovery and reinvention.

Myrthe Klaver, Lotte Sophie Steeneken, Naomi Veeningen, Abdullah Altulea, Marco Demaria

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The EMBO journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Myrthe KlaverEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing (ERIBA), University of Groningen (RUG), University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9512-254X
Lotte Sophie SteenekenEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing (ERIBA), University of Groningen (RUG), University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, Netherlands.
Naomi VeeningenEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing (ERIBA), University of Groningen (RUG), University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, Netherlands.
Abdullah AltuleaEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing (ERIBA), University of Groningen (RUG), University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, Netherlands.
Marco DemariaEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing (ERIBA), University of Groningen (RUG), University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, Netherlands. m.demaria@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8429-4813

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular senescence has undergone a remarkable conceptual evolution since its discovery in 1961. Initially described by Hayflick and Moorhead as the finite proliferative lifespan of cultured human cells, senescence was first viewed as a consequence of cellular aging. The identification of telomere shortening, senescence biomarkers, and oncogene- and damage-induced senescence subsequently established its molecular basis and role as a tumor-suppressive stress response. The discovery of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) further transformed the field by revealing that senescent cells actively communicate with and remodel their tissue environment. Genetic mouse models later demonstrated causal roles for senescent cells in tissue repair, aging, and age-related disease, while senotherapeutics established senescence as a therapeutic target. Here, we trace the major conceptual transitions that shaped the field, from replicative endpoint to stress-response program, regulator of tissue homeostasis, driver of chronic pathology, and clinically actionable process. We discuss the discoveries, controversies, and technological advances underlying these transitions and how emerging single-cell technologies, precision biomarkers, and targeted interventions are shaping the next era of senescence research.

Identifiers

PMID42827203

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.