ArticleMolecular ecology2026
Mosaic Accumulation of Somatic Genetic Variation and Estimates of Age in the Long-Lived Reef-Building Coral Acropora palmata.
Article in Molecular ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Somatic genetic variation (SoGV) accumulates during an organism's lifetime and is traditionally viewed as detrimental rather than adaptive due to links with cancer and senescence. However, in modular organisms like corals, deleterious mutations can be purged at the cellular or polyp level, while adaptive mutations may rise in frequency as polyps create genetically distinct modules. Quantifying the somatic genetic landscape in corals is necessary to understand the role these mutations may have in coral and clonal animal development and evolution. Here, we catalogue somatic genetic variation in eight Acropora palmata colonies from Curaçao. Whole genomes were sequenced (70-100× depth) to document mutation variant allele frequency shifts as genets age. Large numbers of SoGVs were observed in six- to ten-year-old colonies, and inferred mutation rates were used to age a genet of uncertain age to almost a century old. Mutations were not fixed at the polyp or branch levels, i.e., they always displayed frequencies < 0.5 as expected at mutating homozygous sites. However, their allele frequencies followed a power-law distribution, similar to aging human tissues. No signs of positive selection were found; instead SoGVs were under purifying selection. In one colony, mutations in 28 samples from along a branch were analysed using a SNP microarray. Contrary to expectations, genetic and physical distances were unrelated. Along with an observed lack of fixation this pattern may be explained by a large stem cell population, the de-differentiation or dormancy of stem cells, the contribution of strong purifying selection, or a combination of the previously mentioned. Our findings provide a neutral framework against which to test for module-level selection of genetic variation in corals, explore the relationship between physical and genetic distance within a colony, and apply a somatic genetic clock to colonies of Acropora palmata. This work provides fundamental insights into the landscape of somatic mutations in reef-building coral, highlighting the importance of studying somatic genetic variation as they may contribute to genetic diversity and adaptability in colonial animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.