ReviewACS pharmacology & translational science2026
Injectable Hydrogels for Local Pharmacokinetic Control in Solid Tumors: From Passive Reservoirs to Stimulus-Responsive Exposure Systems.
Review in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solid tumors remain difficult therapeutic targets because inadequate and heterogeneous intratumoral exposure, rapid local clearance, and postoperative recurrence can limit durable tumor control. Injectable hydrogels provide locoregional platforms that prolong drug residence within tumors or resection cavities while reducing systemic distribution. However, prolonged retention alone does not justify classifying these systems as pharmacokinetic organlike regulators. Here, we synthesize the literature on injectable hydrogels for solid tumor therapy and distinguish passive long-acting reservoirs from stimulus-responsive local pharmacokinetic regulators using three operational criteria: partial decoupling of local exposure from systemic circulation, context-dependent release or degradation in response to tumor cues, and measurable pharmacokinetic outputs linked to the tissue state or therapeutic response. Preclinical evidence indicates that hydrogel depots can increase local residence time, reduce systemic exposure, remodel the tumor immune microenvironment, and suppress recurrence. Nevertheless, most systems remain better supported as sustained local reservoirs than as fully validated systems with PK organ-like potential. Key gaps include limited matched tumor and plasma pharmacokinetic data, insufficient PK/PD modeling, nonstandardized recurrence end points, and limited clinical validation. This review provides an exposure-centered framework for defining evidence required to support PK-organ-like claims.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.