Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42828556›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Boesenbergia rotunda extract-based mucoadhesive mouth gargle for chemoradiation-induced oral mucositis: A prospective randomized controlled study.

Phitjira Sanguanboonyaphong, Anyamanee Lapmag, Warisada Silaon, Praneet Opanasopit, Woraanong Thiramontre, Suphatcha Khiewvarn, Kanokporn Chamalerk, Worranan Rangsimawong

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Phitjira SanguanboonyaphongFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmacy Practices, Ubon Ratchathani University, Ubon Ratchathani, 34190, Thailand.
Anyamanee LapmagFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmacy Practices, Ubon Ratchathani University, Ubon Ratchathani, 34190, Thailand.
Warisada SilaonDepartment of Industrial Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Rangsit University, Pathum Thani, 12000, Thailand.
Praneet OpanasopitFaculty of Pharmacy, Department of Industrial Pharmacy, Silpakorn University, Nakhon Pathom, 73000, Thailand.
Woraanong ThiramontreDepartment of Radiotherapy, Ubon Ratchathani Cancer Hospital, Ubon Ratchathani, 34000, Thailand.
Suphatcha KhiewvarnDepartment of Radiotherapy, Ubon Ratchathani Cancer Hospital, Ubon Ratchathani, 34000, Thailand.
Kanokporn ChamalerkDepartment of Pharmacy, Ubon Ratchathani Cancer Hospital, Ubon Ratchathani, 34000, Thailand.
Worranan RangsimawongInnovation in Drug and Extract of Agriculture Research Center, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ubon Ratchathani University, Ubon Ratchathani, 34190, Thailand. worranan.r@ubu.ac.th.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0753-0720

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChemotherapy-associated oral mucositis (OM) is a prevalent and debilitating complication in patients undergoing cancer treatment, lacking effective preventive and therapeutic options. Boesenbergia rotunda (BR), a traditional medicinal plant, exhibits potent anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial activities. The objective of this study was to evaluate a BR extract-based mouth gargle for the management of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT)-induced OM.

methodsBR extract was evaluated for cytotoxicity and anti-inflammatory activity. The mucoadhesive mouth gargle was characterized by antimicrobial activity, salivary release, and mucosal deposition. Clinical evaluation was performed in patients with head and neck cancer receiving CCRT in a prospective randomized controlled trial conducted between September 2024 and November 2025. The primary outcome of the clinical phase was to compare the incidence of OM at 6 weeks.

resultsBR extract was non-cytotoxic at concentrations below 1 µg/mL and significantly suppressed nitric oxide production in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. The formulation demonstrated antimicrobial activity, rapid release within 2 min, and effective mucosal deposition. Fifty-six patients were enrolled, with 73.98% adherence. The incidence of overall OM was significantly lower in the BR extract group than in the control group (30.4% vs. 41.1%, p = 0.04). Lip swelling at week 3 occurred less frequently in the BR group than in the non-intervention group (1.8% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.03), while other adverse events were comparable between groups.

conclusionThe BR extract-based mucoadhesive mouth gargle is biocompatible, exhibits anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial activities, and achieves effective mucosal delivery. These findings indicate its potential as a therapeutic strategy for managing CCRT-induced OM. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyMouthwashesPlant ExtractsStomatitisZingiberaceaeAdultAgedAnimalsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiceMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAnti-Inflammatory AgentsMouthwashesPlant ExtractsAnti-inflammatoryAntimicrobialBoesenbergia rotundaConcurrent chemoradiotherapyMucoadhesive mouth gargleOral mucositis

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.