ArticlePediatric research2026
Fathers, not mothers: the male singing voice and the preterm brain's response to song in the NICU.
Article in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06398912 (Studying Newborns' Brain Activity in the NICU Through a Musical Intervention), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Studying Newborns' Brain Activity in the NICU Through a Musical Intervention: the Role of Fundamental Frequency
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe preterm infant leaves the womb still building its auditory brain, trading maternal voice and heartbeat for the noise of intensive care. Singing tries to hand some of that back, and is built almost entirely around the mother, without having ever tested this premise against the father or any other caregiver.
methodsIn a registered trial (NCT06398912) we recorded EEG in preterm infants, each hearing the same stimuli-block from four facilitators (mother, father, female, and male music therapist) crossing kinship with F0/pitch. Delta-band power was the pre-registered primary outcome; the hypothesis was maternal dominance.
resultsHypothesis was not supported. The mother's apparent lead vanished once each session was referenced to its own baseline (silence), while results ran the other way: during the lullaby, the most complex stimulus, and the one the fixed order placed last against waning engagement, the father's voice drew the highest Delta power, and the two male voices together outdrew the female. Results held under bootstrap.
conclusionThe preterm cortex followed the male (father's foremost) low, spectrally full voice, providing a robust signal, pointing somewhere concrete: fathers, among the most sidelined figures in the NICU, may hold a defined, testable role in their own infant's care. IMPACT: The trial's registered prediction-that the maternal voice would most strongly engage the preterm brain-was not supported; during a sung lullaby, male voices, the father's foremost, evoked the largest short-term response. To our knowledge, this is the first full cohort qEEG evidence that a singer's biological sex, rather than maternal kinship, tracks the preterm cortical response to song. If replicated, the result argues for deliberately including fathers and male voices in NICU music and family-centered care, which remain built largely around the mother.
Identifiers
42829374What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.