ReviewSurgical neurology international2026
Perspective/Short Review: Diagnosis and Treatment of Aggressive Vertebral Hemangiomas and Review of 2 Cases.
Review in Surgical neurology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although vertebral hemangiomas (VH) are relatively common, aggressive symptomatic VH are rarely reported (i.e. in up to 11% of cases). Multiple other benign and malignant primary bone tumors must be considered in the differential diagnosis. Here, we review the clinical diagnosis and surgical management for aggressive hemangiomas, while also presenting 2 patients with thoracic lesions requiring posterior surgical decompression/fusion, with/without vertebroplasty, embolization, and/or CyberKnife radiosurgery. Methods: The classification system for these tumors ranges from Types I-IV; I Occupy < 50% of a vertebral body (VB), II-Occupy > 50% VB (IIb Thoracolumbar - Symptomatic), III-Occupy 100% VB, and IV-Occupy 100% VB involved plus extension into the pedicles, laminae, spinous process, and epidural space. Results: Radiographically (i.e. X-rays, MR, CT) these lesions originate in the vertebral bodies, but aggressive VH extend into the pedicles, laminae, spinous processes, and epidural space causing both spinal cord/root (i.e., myelopathy/radiculopathy)) compression. Surgical options include anterior, posterior, or circumferential decompressions with/without fusions, percutaneous vertebroplasty, embolization, radiation, and/or chemotherapy. Early treatment maximizes neurological recovery and limits/avoids permanent injury. Conclusion: Aggressive VH are rare lesions that most frequently occur in the thoracic spine. Notably, the subset of Type IV lesions that extend into the pedicles, laminae, spinous processes, and epidural space may cause symptomatic myelopathy/radiculopathy warranting early surgical intervention to optimize neurological outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.