ReviewCureus2026
Impact of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Mental Health: A Systematic Review of Psychiatric Safety and Antidepressant Potential.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are increasingly used for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity, but concerns about their mental health effects have been raised. Early safety reports linked them to suicidal thoughts and worsening depression; however, evidence remained mixed and unclear. A systematic search was conducted across three databases for studies published between 2021 and May 2026. Out of 617 records identified, 11 studies were finally included after quality checks using appropriate appraisal tools based on study design. This review was not prospectively registered. Data from over 4.9 million patients across eleven primary studies showed that GLP-1RAs did not increase psychiatric risk overall. Ten out of eleven primary studies confirmed either safety or protective psychiatric effects. Increased psychiatric risk was seen in one obesity-specific study; this may partly reflect surveillance or detection bias, though this was not directly tested. Only one of the 11 included studies directly measured mood using validated questionnaires and found that semaglutide was associated with lower (better) depression and anxiety scores. GLP-1 receptor agonists appear to maintain a safe neuropsychiatric profile, with an emerging signal that mood may benefit, currently limited to a single scale-based study among those formally included; most existing evidence remains diagnostic-code-based rather than scale-based. For T2DM patients with stable mood disorders, there is no justification for withholding these medications. For weight management, clinicians may consider baseline mental health screening before starting treatment. Future research must use validated continuous mood rating tools rather than administrative diagnostic codes to properly measure psychological benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.