ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2026
Graphene-Based Materials: A Multifunctional Platform for Comprehensive Perioperative Management of Cancer.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perioperative cancer care constitutes a continuous management process that spans from precise preoperative diagnosis and surgical resection to long-term recurrence monitoring after surgery, each stage of which presents distinct challenges and critically influences patient prognosis and quality of life. Current independent technologies, often coupled with single-functional materials, are unable to cope with this complex, multi-stage, continuous trajectory, resulting in fragmented improvements that are frequently offset by disease deterioration or recurrence. Graphene-based materials (GBMs), owing to their unique physicochemical properties, intrinsic bioactivities, programmable architectures, and dynamic responsiveness, hold promise for constructing a novel multifunctional integrated platform capable of synergistically tackling the multifaceted challenges across the perioperative continuum. Unlike previous literature that focused on isolated applications, this study is the first to conceptualize GBMs as a unified platform for perioperative cancer closed-loop management, covering preoperative diagnosis and intraoperative navigation, postoperative rehabilitation (including hemostasis, antibacterial defense, and wound healing), tissue regeneration, long-term recurrence monitoring, and intervention. Our objective is to illustrate how GBM-based platforms integrate disparate stages of care, thereby transforming perioperative cancer management from a passive, fragmented approach into a proactive and closed-loop system that enables dynamic monitoring, intelligent responsiveness, and precise intervention throughout the entire treatment cycle. Despite these advantages, clinical translation still necessitates advances in biosafety profiling, renal clearance evaluation, and regulatory pathway navigation, which can be achieved through rational material design, standardized safety assessment, and early engagement with regulatory agencies. Such efforts will facilitate the transition of GBMs from the laboratory to the clinic and ultimately improve patient outcomes and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.