ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026
Validation of the behavioural and social drivers of influenza vaccine survey in Australia: Cognitive interviews and psychometric evaluation.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Seasonal influenza vaccination reduces the risk of contracting influenza. In Australia, vaccination coverage is consistently low among the most at-risk groups eligible for the free influenza vaccine. To establish an annual national monitoring of the behavioral and social drivers of influenza vaccination, we validated the World Health Organization's Behavioral and Social Drivers of Influenza Vaccination survey. Ours is the first study reporting the validation results of the newly developed survey tool. Two validation stages occurred: first, cognitive interviews and survey item revisions based on feedback; second, collecting quantitative data, performing psychometric analysis, including factor analysis, and assessing the association between survey items and influenza vaccination intention using polychoric correlation and a random forest model to determine each item's importance. We modified nine of the 31 survey items based on cognitive interviews with 16 adults. Based on the psychometric evaluation of 2055 respondents, we identified and validated five factors that underlie the survey structure and aligned well with the four domains of the BeSD framework: Thinking and Feeling, Social Processes, Motivation, and Practical Issues. Each item correlated with the intention to receive influenza vaccine, particularly those related to perceived vaccine importance and social responsibility. We recommend further validation in various contexts, especially to assess the survey's predictive validity regarding actual vaccination uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.