ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Quantifying the Dynamics of Network Detachment Across Scientific, Technological, Commercial, and Pharmacological Domains.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the vast literature on complex network dynamics, our understanding of the network detachment process remains limited. This understanding is essential for deeper insight into network evolution. Here, we analyze four large-scale datasets that capture the structural patterns of detachment across scientific, technological, commercial, and pharmacological domains. Across these diverse domains, we uncover one simple pattern of preferential detachment in social systems, whereby the probability for individuals or organizations to disengage from a previously adopted practice correlates with the number of network neighbors who have already detached. To examine the structural consequences of this empirical pattern, we show that preferential detachment can fundamentally alter how networked systems disintegrate, inducing a phase transition in systems typically considered robust against detachment. We further derive an analytical framework to systematically understand the impact of preferential detachment on network dynamics, pinpointing the topological conditions under which it accelerates, decelerates, or leaves unchanged the breakdown of the network compared with random detachment. Together, these results demonstrate that the detachment dynamics follow simple yet reproducible patterns, deepening our quantitative understanding of detachment within networked social systems, with implications for the robustness and functioning of innovation communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.