Trial reportNature communications2026
RAGE mediates LPS-induced inflammatory pain in human skin - a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled full crossover study.
Trial report in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07092215 (Mechanisms of Pain Hypersensitivity in a Human Skin Inflammation Model - A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Crossover Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Mechanisms of Pain Hypersensitivity in a Human Skin Inflammation Model - A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Crossover Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory pain is a major clinical challenge, yet appropriate human models mimicking local infection are lacking. We established a human pain model based on intradermal administration of lipopolysaccharide, a component of Gram-negative bacteria, and investigated the time course and underlying molecular mechanisms of inflammatory pain hypersensitivity. A placebo-controlled pilot study with 12 healthy subjects showed that intradermal lipopolysaccharide injection induces hyperaemia peaking at 4.5 h and mechanical hypersensitivity peaking at 6 h. Hypersensitivity to increasingly acidic injections and mechanical pinch lasts longer than hyperaemia. The double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled full crossover main study (NCT07092215) included 40 healthy subjects and investigated the role of the Receptor for Advanced Glycation End-products. The primary hypothesis was: 'The blood flow is different in lipopolysaccharide-injected skin spots compared to lipopolysaccharide-injected skin spots where azeliragon is co-injected'. The two secondary hypotheses were: 'Acid-induced pain is different in lipopolysaccharide-injected skin spots compared to lipopolysaccharide-injected skin spots where azeliragon is co-injected' and 'Mechanical pinch-induced pain is different in lipopolysaccharide-injected skin spots compared to lipopolysaccharide-injected skin spots where azeliragon is co-injected'. Co-injection of the respective antagonist azeliragon largely reduces lipopolysaccharide-induced hyperaemia (-87%) and significantly attenuates hypersensitivity to mechanical (-55%) and increasingly acidic stimuli (-40%). In contrast, the Toll-like receptor 4 antagonist resatorvid has no effect on these readouts. In both naïve and inflamed skin, the TRPV1 antagonist BCTC inhibits the majority of acid-induced pain. Lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation causes a substantial shift in the pH sensitivity of pain, suggesting that even mild tissue acidification contributes to inflammatory pain. The human lipopolysaccharide skin inflammation model depends largely on the Receptor for Advanced Glycation End-products, highlighting its potential as a target in inflammation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.