Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42830413›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2026

The Australian Diabetes Foot Registry: From Conceptualisation to National Collaboration.

Joel Willem Johan Lasschuit, Peter A Lazzarini, Georgina Frank, Sofianos Andrikopoulos, Natalie Wischer, Stephen M Twigg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joel Willem Johan LasschuitNational Association of Diabetes Centres, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8954-1086
Peter A LazzariniAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8235-7964
Georgina FrankDepartment of Podiatry, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3335-3999
Sofianos AndrikopoulosAustralian Diabetes Society, Sydney, Australia.
Natalie WischerNational Association of Diabetes Centres, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4741-6743
Stephen M TwiggDepartment of Endocrinology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2681-8201

Funding

Australian Diabetes SocietyNational Association of Diabetes CentresUniversity of New South Wales CAUL Gold CY26
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Australian Diabetes Foot Registry (ADFR) is a national prospective, longitudinal clinical quality registry established in 2020 to standardise data capture and reporting in Interdisciplinary Diabetes High Risk Foot Services. We describe the ADFR's methodology and early implementation outcomes. Stakeholder consultation informed development of the minimum dataset, governance framework and data-capture workflow. Centrally supported ethics and jurisdictional approvals facilitated site onboarding. Clinical, management and outcome data were collected, de-identified and amalgamated in a national repository. Implementation outcomes included recruitment metrics, case ascertainment, mandatory-field missing data, reporting cycles, conference presentations and inaugural report feedback. Seventy-four sites expressed interest and 49 sites completed implementation. Median time from application to commencement was 7 (IQR 4-12) months under a nationally recognised ethics approval. By mid-2025, 10 919 participants were registered, comprising 13 150 care episodes and 22 383 ulcerations. In 2024-2025, mean service-level case ascertainment was 80%, and the mandatory-field missing data rate was 0%-7%. Four annual reporting cycles have been completed, all services strongly endorsed participation after the inaugural report, and data informed 29 conference presentations. The ADFR demonstrates a feasible, scalable national registry model, enabling timely audit and benchmarking and actionable reporting to support quality improvement, research and collaboration.

Indexed as

Diabetic FootRegistriesAgedAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studiesdiabetes foot diseasediabetes foot registryinterdisciplinary high‐risk/specialist foot services

Identifiers

PMID42830413
PMCPMC13635280

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.