ArticleJournal of mood and anxiety disorders2026
Repetitive negative thinking is associated with conflict-related neural activity that modulates evidence accumulation.
Article in Journal of mood and anxiety disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Repetitive negative thinking (RNT), including worry and rumination, is a transdiagnostic feature of anxiety and depressive disorders and is linked to altered cognitive control. However, the decision-level mechanisms underlying these alterations are not well understood. Here, we examined whether individual variation in RNT is associated with neural and computational markers of conflict processing. Thirty-seven participants completed a flanker task while undergoing electroencephalography, and inhibitory control dynamics were quantified using hierarchical drift diffusion modeling. Behaviorally, RNT was not associated with traditional behavioral markers of conflict processing. At the neural level, higher RNT was associated with a more negative midfrontal conflict N2. Computationally, higher RNT was associated with larger congruent-incongruent differences in drift rate. Similarly, more negative midfrontal N2 activity was associated with greater modulation of drift rate congruency effects. An exploratory mediation analysis indicated that the midfrontal conflict N2 significantly mediated the effect of RNT on drift rate differences between congruent and incongruent trials. These findings indicate that elevated RNT is associated with heightened conflict-related neural activity that increases the degree to which evidence accumulation is modulated by conflict, suggesting a more reactive and context-sensitive engagement of cognitive control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.