Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42831583›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2026

Perceived barriers to eye care use among secondary school students with pinhole-improvable reduced visual acuity in two schools in Kampala, Uganda: a cross-sectional study.

Nicholas Musisi Kagumba, Gilbert Ssebuliba, Anguyo Dralega, Naomi Nsubuga, Jemini Patel, Uday Kumar Addepalli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicholas Musisi KagumbaDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0009-0001-6370-246X
Gilbert SsebulibaDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Anguyo DralegaDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Naomi NsubugaDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Jemini PatelDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Uday Kumar AddepalliDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUncorrected refractive error (URE) is a primary cause of visual impairment (VI). Although URE causes VI and increases the risk of amblyopia in school-going children, no studies have examined barriers to uptake of refractive eye-care services among secondary school students in Uganda. This study reports the perceived reasons for the poor uptake of refractive eye care services among students at two secondary schools in Kampala, Uganda.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in two secondary schools in Kampala between March 2019 and April 2019. Students' presenting distance visual acuities (DVA) were measured. Participants with a DVA worse than 6/9 were reassessed using a pinhole. Those not using spectacles or contact lenses who had pinhole-improvable reduced distance visual acuity suggestive of uncorrected refractive error were administered a structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Chi-square tests were performed to assess the association between sex and the proportion of screened students with pinhole-improvable, reduced distance visual acuity suggestive of uncorrected refractive error.

results407 students were screened for refractive errors. In total, 10.81% (44/407, 95% CI:8.15% to 14.20%) of screened students had pinhole-improvable reduced distance visual acuity suggestive of uncorrected refractive error (URE). Perceived barriers towards refractive eye-care use reported included fear of surgery (52.27%, 95% CI: 37.94% to 66.25%), unawareness of the available eye care services (50.00%, 95% CI: 35.83% to 64.17%) and not feeling comfortable with the indigenous practitioner to whom they had access (19/44,43.18%, 95% CI: 29.68% to 57.78%). Financial limitations were stated as an important barrier by 20.00% (5/25, 20.00%, 95% CI:95% CI: 8.86% to 39.13%) of participants who stated the most important barrier.

conclusionAmong students who participated in screening at two secondary schools, a small subgroup had pinhole-improvable reduced distance visual acuity suggestive of an uncorrected refractive component. Exploratory questionnaire responses identified possible barriers related to awareness, perceptions of treatment, access, cost, and family or social influences. These findings require confirmation using refraction-based case definitions, probability sampling, and a culturally adapted and validated adolescent questionnaire.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityPatient Acceptance of Health CareRefractive ErrorsStudentsAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesEyeglassesFemaleHumansMaleSchoolsSurveys and QuestionnairesUgandaVision ScreeningVisual Acuitybarriersrefractive servicessecondary schoolsstudentsUncorrected refractive errors

Identifiers

PMID42831583
PMCPMC13644455

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.