ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Robust cross-anatomy image registration leveraging keypoint priors and contour-based assessment.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate registration between lateral cephalometric radiographs and facial profile photographs is a prerequisite for integrated craniofacial analysis, yet it remains challenging due to inherent modality gaps and the absence of clinically validated evaluation criteria. This study presents a clinically-driven engineering framework that systematically integrates high-resolution keypoint localization with a weighted Procrustes-based two-dimensional similarity registration. The uniform scale factor accommodates global magnification differences between imaging modalities, while shearing and local non-rigid deformation are excluded. To ensure clinical interpretability, we incorporate expert-defined anatomical priors as weights into the transformation process and introduce an adaptive seed-driven contour tracking (ASDCT) algorithm for precise performance evaluation. Experiments on 198 paired clinical samples demonstrate that our framework achieves stable performance (Contour Distance of 3.52 pixels; Contour Dilation Overlap of 87%) and provides metrics that correlate strongly with expert clinical assessments. By unifying landmark-guided alignment and boundary-consistency evaluation, this framework offers a robust, reproducible, and anatomically reliable solution for cross-modal craniofacial integration, effectively bridging the gap between computational precision and clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42832158What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.