ArticleJMIR cancer2026
The Impacts of Social Marketing Campaigns on Breast Cancer Awareness and Screening: Scoping Review.
Article in JMIR cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Promotional activities, such as social marketing approaches, are important for raising cancer awareness and increasing breast cancer screening participation. Such interventions are designed to facilitate change and maintain positive health behaviors at both the community and society level. With the growing use of these promotional activities in public health, it is pertinent to map available studies to inform future evaluations and the development of effective interventions. Objective: This study aimed to review existing studies on how social marketing interventions have been used to promote breast cancer screening and early diagnosis. The specific objectives were to assess the characteristics of social marketing interventions aimed at promoting breast cancer screening, identify the methodological approaches used in evaluating the interventions, identify the outcomes used to measure the impact of social marketing interventions for breast cancer screening, and assess the impacts of social marketing interventions when promoting breast cancer screening. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in 6 electronic databases to identify qualitative and quantitative evaluations of social marketing interventions targeting breast cancer screening and early diagnosis. Titles and abstracts were reviewed independently by two reviewers, followed by data extraction and verification. The methodological quality was evaluated using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Outcomes were categorized using an adapted version of key performance indicators and metrics related to social media use in health promotion. Results: Overall, 15 research articles were eligible and analyzed. The 4 types of social marketing interventions identified were health professional and educational strategies, social media or mass media campaigns, community outreach campaigns, and video-based marketing. The predominant intervention source was public health government bodies, followed by regional health services, cancer charities, and educational institutions. Most interventions were designed to influence breast cancer screening behaviors by raising awareness through advertisements, educational interventions, and fundraising activities. Most interventions reached a large audience (>500 people), but participants had mixed awareness and perceptions toward social marketing strategies, and the outcomes were shaped by demographic factors such as cultural backgrounds, age, education, marital status, and occupation. Knowledge gaps, cost concerns, and the lack of physician recommendations also constituted key barriers to screening uptake. Behavior change outcomes were sparingly assessed in most interventions, thereby contributing to limited understanding of mechanisms affecting screening uptake. Conclusions: Available evidence suggests that social marketing interventions may enhance breast cancer screening and early diagnosis. However, robust evaluations of these interventions and assessment of behavior change outcomes could be performed in future research by using well-established evaluation frameworks and reporting guidelines. Developers and funders of these campaigns should also consider using an evaluation plan before conducting the actual campaign.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.