Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42834072›Full record

ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2026

Toward patient-centered blood pressure monitoring: first evaluation of a low-pressure and rapid oscillometric method for reducing cuff-related measurement burden.

Yuki Ota, Mitsuo Kuwabara, Kazuomi Kario

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuki OtaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan.
Mitsuo KuwabaraDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan.
Kazuomi KarioDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan. kkario@jichi.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) monitoring is essential for hypertension management. Repeated cuff inflation may cause discomfort and reduce acceptance of out-of-office BP monitoring. To address this, we developed a novel low-pressure and rapid oscillometric method designed to reduce maximum cuff pressure (MaxCP) and measurement duration. In this participant-blinded crossover study, we evaluated cuff-related measurement burden using the Omron HEM-7290T, the first automated upper-arm BP monitor to use the novel method. The HEM-7290T was compared with an otherwise identical device using a conventional inflation-based method (Reference A; n = 110 participants) and with a conventional deflation-based oscillometric BP monitor (Reference B; n = 93 participants). The primary endpoint was the difference in visual analog scale (VAS) score for perceived cuff tightness. Compared with Reference A and Reference B, HEM-7290T reduced VAS scores by 8.6 points (95% CI, 6.5-10.8; p < 0.001) and 9.5 points (95% CI, 7.1-11.8; p < 0.001), respectively. Greater reductions in VAS scores were associated with more frequent selection of the HEM-7290T measurement as the one associated with the least perceived cuff tightness. Compared with Reference A and Reference B, respectively, MaxCP was reduced by 32.0 mmHg and 51.0 mmHg, while measurement duration was reduced by 6.8 s and 14.5 s. In conclusion, the novel low-pressure and rapid oscillometric method significantly reduced subjective and objective measures of cuff-related measurement burden, and measurements performed with the HEM-7290T were more frequently selected as involving the least cuff tightness than measurements performed using conventional methods.

Indexed as

blood pressure monitoringcuff-related measurement burden reductionoscillometric methodpatient-centered carevisual analog scale

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.