SynthesisPediatric research2026
Heart rate variability after hospital discharge in perinatal risk populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerinatal risk factors such as preterm birth, intrauterine growth restriction, and low birth weight are linked to elevated cardiovascular and neurodevelopmental risk. Heart rate variability (HRV) is widely used to assess autonomic function in these populations, yet findings remain inconsistent. While autonomic differences during the NICU period are well established, less is known about HRV after hospital discharge across childhood and adulthood.
methodsPubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and APA PsycArticles were searched through April 2025, supplemented by ClinicalTrials.gov and reference screening. Peer-reviewed studies comparing HRV between perinatal risk populations and healthy full-term controls after hospital discharge were eligible. We extracted 156 effect sizes from 27 studies.
resultsOverall effects were modest and highly heterogeneous (d = -0.21, p = 0.14; I² = 89.3%). Growth-related conditions (small-for-gestational-age, intrauterine growth restriction) showed the most consistent HRV reductions. Preterm birth and low birth weight showed no significant overall effects but substantial between-study heterogeneity across age groups. Younger samples showed larger group differences than older samples.
conclusionAutonomic associations with perinatal risk factors appear condition-specific and age-dependent, although the predominantly cross-sectional design precludes conclusions about within-individual change. Findings underscore the importance of age- and condition-specific assessment and the need for longitudinal follow-up. IMPACT: HRV associations with perinatal risk factors are condition-specific and vary across age. Effect sizes were most consistent for growth-related conditions (small-for-gestational-age and intrauterine growth restriction), pronounced in preterm-born infants but smaller and more variable in older groups, and small or non-significant for low and extremely low birth weight samples. This is the first meta-analysis to quantify HRV differences across perinatal risk populations from infancy to adulthood, focusing on the post-discharge period and showing that timing and etiology, rather than parameter choice, drive inconsistencies. The findings guide condition-specific assessment and underscore the need for longitudinal studies separating catch-up from survivor bias.
Identifiers
42834156What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.