Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42834297›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

AutoLMISeg: A Fully Automated Pipeline for 3D Lumbar Muscle Volumetry and Densitometry on CT - Technical Validation Against an Operator-Driven Workflow.

Nolwen Lemonnier, David Pichard, Simon Arvati, Maxime L'Hermette, Matthieu Lalevee, Paul Michelin, Mourad Ould-Slimane

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nolwen LemonnierDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, 1 Rue de Germont, Rouen, 76031, France. n.lemonnier@chu-rouen.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-8164-0132
David PichardDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, 1 Rue de Germont, Rouen, 76031, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5919-6094
Simon ArvatiDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-9718-0033
Maxime L'HermetteCETAPS, UR 3832, Rouen Normandy University, Mont-Saint-Aignan, France.
Matthieu LaleveeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, 1 Rue de Germont, Rouen, 76031, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5058-8867
Paul MichelinDepartment of Radiology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7483-4249
Mourad Ould-SlimaneDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, 1 Rue de Germont, Rouen, 76031, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1420-8585

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opportunistic body composition analysis using single-slice 2D computed tomography scans is limited by anatomical variations and field-of-view constraints. Although 3D volumetry is more comprehensive, it is not widely adopted due to the time-consuming nature of manual segmentation. The objective is to technically validate AutoLMISeg (Automated Lumbar Muscle Index Segmentation), a fully automated "zero-click" deep learning pipeline for 3D L1-L5 lumbar muscle volumetry and densitometry. Sixty-nine CT scans were analyzed retrospectively. AutoLMISeg (GPU-accelerated) was compared to a human-in-the-loop reference standard (operator-driven segmentation). Accuracy was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and volumetric agreement was evaluated using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and Bland-Altman analysis. Processing times were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. AutoLMISeg showed excellent spatial agreement, with a mean DSC of 0.928 ± 0.019. Volumetric concordance was nearly perfect (CCC = 0.971), with a negligible mean bias of + 16.32 cm

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceBody compositionComputed tomographyDeep learningSarcopeniaVolumetric segmentation

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.