ReviewGynecologic oncology reports2026
Advances in uterine sarcoma management: A mini-review of clinical practice and molecular insights.
Review in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uterine sarcomas are rare, biologically heterogeneous mesenchymal malignancies with the poorest survival among uterine cancers. Management has historically been extrapolated from soft tissue sarcomas, but these tumors are increasingly recognized as histologically and molecularly distinct diseases. This review summarizes current understanding of the diagnosis, classification, and management of uterine leiomyosarcoma, low- and high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, undifferentiated uterine sarcoma, and adenosarcoma, and discusses emerging molecular and therapeutic advances. Preoperative diagnosis remains challenging, and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, immunohistochemistry, and next-generation sequencing have improved diagnostic accuracy and identification of actionable molecular alterations. Complete surgical resection remains the standard for localized disease, with the extent of surgical staging guided by histologic subtype and hormone receptor status. Adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy show limited survival benefit overall, though select high-grade tumors may benefit from doxorubicin-based regimens. For advanced or recurrent leiomyosarcoma, combination doxorubicin plus trabectedin has become a new first-line standard, and targeted agents such as pazopanib, cabozantinib with temozolomide, and PARP inhibitors in BRCA-altered tumors have expanded treatment options. Endocrine therapy remains central to management of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, while immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown limited efficacy outside of rare microsatellite instability-high tumors. Emerging tools such as circulating tumor DNA are being explored to improve surveillance and early detection of recurrence. Continued progress in histology-specific and molecularly stratified clinical trials will be essential to further refine risk-adapted, biomarker-driven treatment strategies and improve outcomes for patients with uterine sarcoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.