Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42835433›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026

Impact of adding r-LH to r-FSH during ovarian stimulation on reproductive outcomes of women with polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome undergoing

Inês Azevedo, Mafalda V Moreira, Sofia S Pereira, Carla Leal, Márcia Barreiro, Mariana P Monteiro, Emídio Vale-Fernandes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Inês AzevedoUnit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine (UMIB), School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Mafalda V MoreiraUnit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine (UMIB), School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Sofia S PereiraUnit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine (UMIB), School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Carla LealUnit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine (UMIB), School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Márcia BarreiroUnit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine (UMIB), School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Mariana P MonteiroUnit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine (UMIB), School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Emídio Vale-FernandesUnit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine (UMIB), School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Polyendocrine Metabolic Ovarian Syndrome (PMOS) is a common endocrine disorder and a leading cause of anovulatory infertility. In women with PMOS, controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) often results in heterogeneous responses, with many oocytes of poor quality and lower fertilization rates. The combined use of recombinant Luteinizing Hormone (r-LH) and recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (r-FSH) has shown potential to improve Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) outcomes in specific populations, such as women with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism or advanced age. However, its benefits in women with PMOS remain uncertain. This retrospective cohort study explores whether adding r-LH to r-FSH during COS improves reproductive outcomes in women with PMOS undergoing ART. Results: The study included 156 women diagnosed with PMOS according to Rotterdam criteria, undergoing COS at a single tertiary center. After propensity score matching for age, body mass index (BMI), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), LH, and LH/FSH ratio, 106 women were divided into two groups: 53 received r-LH/r-FSH, and 53 received r-FSH alone. Baseline data, stimulation parameters, and ART outcomes were analyzed. Women in the r-LH/r-FSH group required a higher cumulative FSH dose (2932 ± 848 vs. 2455 ± 588IU, p<0.002), produced more follicles on trigger day (13.91 ± 7.45 vs. 10.09 ± 5.55, p=0.014), and had more oocytes injected (13.81 ± 8.01 vs. 11.66 ± 5.57, p=0.0499). Multivariate analysis confirmed r-LH/r-FSH was independently associated with increased follicular recruitment, regardless of AMH levels. However, stimulation protocol was not a significant predictor of oocyte count; age and AMH remained the primary factors. Total FSH dose was not associated with follicle number. No significant differences were observed in cumulative live birth rate; however, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) after frozen embryo transfer (FET) was higher in the control group (54.5% vs. 25.0%, p=0.043). Conclusion: Adding r-LH to r-FSH during COS in women with PMOS was associated with increased follicular recruitment but did not improve live birth or overall pregnancy rates. Notably, CPR after FET was lower with r-LH/r-FSH. These findings suggest r-LH may modulate ovarian response, but further research is needed to clarify its role in ART protocols. Due to the retrospective, non-randomized design, these results are hypothesis-generating, and routine use of r-LH in this setting cannot currently be recommended.

Indexed as

Fertilization in VitroFollicle Stimulating HormoneInfertility, FemaleLuteinizing HormoneOvulation InductionAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy RateRecombinant ProteinsRetrospective StudiesFollicle Stimulating HormoneLuteinizing HormoneRecombinant Proteinscontrolled ovarian stimulationin vitro fertilizationpolyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndromerecombinant follicle-stimulating hormonerecombinant luteinizing hormonereproductive outcomes

Identifiers

PMID42835433
PMCPMC13635360

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.