ArticleComprehensive physiology2026
Ghrelin Drives Food Intake by Attentional Bias Toward Food Cues.
Article in Comprehensive physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food-predictive cues can promote eating, but the contribution of metabolic signals to cue-guided behavior remains incompletely understood. Ghrelin is an orexigenic hunger hormone that has previously been linked to behavioral and neural responses to food-predictive cues, although many paradigms cannot distinguish general hunger-driven intake from intake expressed in response to discrete conditioned cues. We developed a home-cage operant task using the Feeding Experimentation Device 3 (FED3) to assess attention-linked responding to an illuminated food-predictive food cue in male mice. Following staged training, eight mice were tested under fed, overnight-fasted and ghrelin-treated conditions in a crossover design. Fasting and ghrelin increased correct and premature responses, and reduced omissions, indicating enhanced engagement with the conditioned food cue, with motivational and impulsivity-related processes likely contributing to the behavioral profile. Ghrelin increased food intake during the cue-guided task but not during FreeFeeding in the absence of the illuminated predictive cue, whereas fasting increased intake in both contexts. The maximum obtainable food intake was elevated by fasting and ghrelin, but only during the cue-guided task. These findings establish a home-cage FED3-based paradigm for resolving multiple attention-linked components of food-cue responding and show that acute ghrelin and fasting produce overlapping effects on cue-guided engagement but differ in their effects on food intake across task contexts, with ghrelin preferentially increasing intake when food availability is signaled by a conditioned cue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.