ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
A longitudinal analysis of the clinical practice of ketamine assisted psychotherapy with adolescents and young adults.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ketamine Assisted Psychotherapy (KAP) is a developing modality with broad impact on humans suffering with a variety of emotional and relationship difficulties that encompass many diagnostic entities. Our application of KAP has extended to and included the treatment of adolescents and young adults in a family therapy format. Given the increasing scope and complexity of the adolescent mental health crisis and the frequent failures to respond to conventional treatment, the promise of KAP deserves thorough investigation. Methods: We previously described the process of KAP in our adolescent population that included four case reports exemplifying our approach. Here we report on the longitudinal clinical experience of 19 adolescents and young adults (ages 14-24; mean age 19.3 ± 3.1 years; 11 female, 7 male, 1 non-binary) who completed three or more KAP sessions at a single community outpatient clinic. Results: BDI-II scores declined by an estimated 0.65 points per visit (95% CI: -0.90, -0.40) and HAM-A scores by 0.21 points per visit (95% CI: -0.44, +0.01), based on linear mixed-effects models. Approximately 63.2% of patients (12/19) achieved medium or large individual treatment effects on BDI; 47.4% (9/19) on HAM-A. Physician and patient reports indicated overall benefit in 68.4% of cases (13/19), including marked reductions in suicidality in at-risk patients. Ketamine was well tolerated across 167 documented sessions; nausea was the only notable adverse event, occurring in 5.4% of sessions and largely manageable with standard antiemetics. No hospitalizations, substance misuse, or evidence of neurological harm occurred over a median individual follow-up of 5.6 months (mean 10.1, range 0.9-36.4 months). Discussion: These findings suggest that KAP is feasible and well tolerated in a diagnostically complex adolescent population, with clinically meaningful reductions in depression and a similar trend for anxiety associated with continued treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first report to provide longitudinal quantitative data for office-based KAP in adolescents and young adults, and it establishes a foundation for and supports the design of future controlled trials in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.