ReviewRegenerative biomaterials2026
Electroactive biomaterials modulating ion channels in nervous system regeneration.
Review in Regenerative biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic injury to the central and peripheral nervous systems disrupts the electrophysiological microenvironment through persistent ionic dysregulation and maladaptive ion channel remodeling, creating conditions that are fundamentally hostile to endogenous repair. Conventional biomaterials, while offering structural support, remain electrically inert and unable to reconstitute the bioelectric signaling context essential for functional neural regeneration. Here, we review the emerging class of electroactive biomaterials, encompassing conductive and piezoelectric platforms that are engineered to actively interface with and therapeutically remodel this pathological milieu. We first systematically characterize the electrophysiological sequelae of neurotrauma, detailing how glutamate excitotoxicity, GABAergic polarity inversion and voltage-gated channel dysfunction collectively drive aberrant depolarized states in both central and peripheral injury contexts. We then analyze how electroactive scaffolds transduce or autonomously generate localized electrical cues to modulate ion channel kinetics and activate neurogenic cascades across brain, spinal cord and peripheral nerve injury models. Finally, we critically examine translational barriers-including interfacial impedance mismatch, asynchronous biodegradation and neuroimmune reactivity-that currently impede clinical deployment. This synthesis identifies key design imperatives for next-generation bioelectronic therapies capable of dynamically restoring electrophysiological homeostasis to promote meaningful neural recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.