ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
AI-guided ethnopharmacology for cardiovascular drug discovery: from biomedical data to experimental validation.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite substantial advances in pharmacological therapy, cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Botanical drugs represent a rich source of structurally diverse bioactive metabolites, yet their translation into modern cardiovascular therapeutics remains limited by chemical complexity, incomplete mechanistic understanding, and challenges in experimental validation. Meanwhile, the rapid expansion of biomedical data resources and advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have created new opportunities to systematically investigate botanical drugs beyond empirical approaches. In this review, we summarize the major biomedical data resources supporting AI-guided ethnopharmacology, including phytochemical and ethnomedicinal databases, multiomics datasets, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, perturbation-response resources, biological interaction networks, and clinical evidence. We then discuss the computational approaches used for molecular property prediction, drug-target interaction prediction, perturbation-response modeling, and foundation-model transfer learning, highlighting how these complementary strategies address distinct stages of pharmacological discovery. Building on these advances, we propose two complementary AI-guided discovery frameworks: a compound-first strategy that predicts the pharmacological activities of botanical drugs and a disease-first strategy that identifies natural products capable of reversing disease-associated molecular and cellular states. We further discuss emerging applications in cardiovascular diseases, emphasizing the integration of AI with single-cell atlases, disease-state prediction, mechanistic investigation, and experimental validation to prioritize candidate botanical therapeutics. Finally, we outline current challenges in data standardization, model robustness, interpretability, and prospective validation. We propose that AI-guided ethnopharmacology should be viewed as a hypothesis-generation framework that complements, rather than replaces, pharmacological experimentation. When supported by standardized botanical materials, high-quality multimodal data, rigorous biological validation, and prospective clinical evaluation, AI has the potential to accelerate cardiovascular botanical drug discovery and facilitate the translation of ethnomedicinal knowledge into modern precision therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.