ArticleJournal of human hypertension2026
Is the antihypertensive activity of Hibiscus sabdariffa affected by factors such as origin of the plant and time of decoction? Implications for clinical practice.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hibiscus sabdariffa is effective against hypertension in clinical trials, with a dose-response effect, making it an important, accessible and sustainable treatment. The aim of the present work was to clarify the influence of origin of Hibiscus on clinical effect and decoction time on the yield of active substances, in order to issue recommendations for use. This study reviewed blood pressure progress in three clinical trials after 3-4 weeks of Hibiscus tea consumption, with batches analyzed for total anthocyanins (TA) and hibiscus acid (HA), the 2 known active substances, with two different decoction times (10 vs 20 min). HA levels appeared consistent across batches for a given decoction time, whereas TA levels varied up to 4-fold. Despite this variation, clinical outcomes remained similar. Quantities of TA extracted increased with a longer decoction time. These results suggest that the batch of Hibiscus does not significantly influence its antihypertensive activity, and that HA is a main active principle. Thus, a future perspective of this work could be the development of a more available method, other than NMR, for the characterization of the HA content. Clinical practice should involve adjusting Hibiscus dosage based on individual BP response. Starting treatment with, instead of 10 g, 2.5 g/day and adjusting as needed is recommended, and a 20 min decoction remains advisable. HS decoctions can be recommended for broad BP control thanks to their safety and effectiveness.
Identifiers
42838985What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.