Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42839011›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2026

A roadmap towards clinical use of molecular biomarkers in acute ischaemic stroke.

Steffen Tiedt, Naomi Vlegels, Konstantinos Dimitriadis, Wenlu Li, Glen C Jickling, Louise D McCullough, Arthur Liesz, Eng H Lo, Michael D Hill

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Steffen TiedtInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), LMU University Hospital, LMU Medizin, Ludwig-Maximillians-Universität München, Munich, Germany. steffen.tiedt@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8817-8457
Naomi VlegelsInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), LMU University Hospital, LMU Medizin, Ludwig-Maximillians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Konstantinos DimitriadisDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Medizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Wenlu LiZhejiang Key Laboratory of Neuropsychopharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Glen C JicklingDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Louise D McCulloughDepartment of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8050-1686
Arthur LieszInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), LMU University Hospital, LMU Medizin, Ludwig-Maximillians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9069-2594
Eng H LoDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael D HillDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. michael.hill@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6269-1543

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute ischaemic stroke remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide, and even highly effective reperfusion therapies benefit only a fraction of patients. Current clinical decision-making relies largely on clinical examination and imaging, which provide limited insight into the molecular mechanisms that drive injury progression, treatment response and recovery. Molecular biomarkers offer a complementary window into this biology: they can resolve pathway activity at the cellular level, detect pre-morphological tissue stress, report on multi-organ processes and enable high-frequency, minimally invasive monitoring. Here we synthesize emerging evidence across selected, interconnected, outcome-relevant pathomechanisms of acute ischaemic stroke, spanning ischaemic brain injury, metabolism, systemic inflammation and gut dysbiosis. We highlight promising biomarker candidates including brain-derived tau, neurofilament light chain, metabolic and inflammatory signatures and microbiota-derived metabolites and argue that substantial further work is required. In particular, we emphasize the need to prioritize biomarkers as tools for elucidating human stroke pathophysiology rather than focusing solely on therapeutic targets. To guide this effort, we propose a pragmatic, six-phase roadmap from discovery to clinical implementation that emphasizes context of use, assay development, clinical validation and biomarker-guided trials. Applied systematically, mechanism-informed biomarkers could enable more precise, biology-guided stroke care and help to close the translational gap.

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.