ReviewCardiovascular drugs and therapy2026
Precision Use of Ivabradine in Contemporary HFrEF: From Heart Rate Reduction to Physiological Optimization.
Review in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo reassess the contemporary role of ivabradine in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and propose a precision-oriented framework for individualized heart rate management in the era of foundational guideline-directed medical therapy. METHODS AND
resultsIvabradine selectively reduces sinus rate without direct negative inotropic effects, with established benefits in selected patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and persistent sinus tachycardia. However, recent meta-analyses differ substantially in study populations, endpoint availability, and background therapy, limiting firm conclusions regarding the incremental effect of ivabradine on major clinical outcomes in the contemporary treatment era. This review integrates established and emerging evidence, with particular emphasis on the conceptual distinction between maladaptive and compensatory tachycardia, candidate individualized and dynamic heart-rate strategies, transmitral filling patterns, atrioventricular timing, and electrophysiological effects beyond the sinoatrial node. Evidence in acute heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and acute myocardial infarction is also considered. Ivabradine should complement rather than replace foundational guideline-directed medical therapy, while physiology-guided titration remains investigational.
conclusionThe contemporary role of ivabradine may extend beyond fixed heart rate thresholds toward individualized physiological optimization. The immediate objective of such an approach is to improve filling, hemodynamic tolerance, and treatment response rather than to assume a direct survival benefit. Whether physiology-guided ivabradine therapy improves heart failure hospitalization or survival requires prospective validation before such strategies can be incorporated into routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42839188What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.