ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026
Potential of isotoxic dose escalation with robustly optimized VMAT and IMPT for large hepatocellular carcinoma according to baseline liver function.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLarge hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) adjacent to gastrointestinal (GI) organs presents a constrained radiotherapy problem because dose escalation is limited by both hepatic reserve and serial-organ tolerance. Although intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) can reduce uninvolved liver irradiation, its achievable advantage over volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) may depend on baseline liver function and robustness to treatment uncertainties. PURPOSE: To present and demonstrate a robust isotoxic dose-escalation framework for evaluating IMPT and VMAT in large HCC adjacent to GI organs while accounting for baseline liver function and treatment uncertainty.
methodsThirteen patients with HCC (equivalent tumor diameter, 3.0-20.9 cm) underwent comparative IMPT and VMAT treatment planning. Robust optimization incorporated 5-mm setup uncertainty for both modalities and 3% range uncertainty for IMPT. Dose escalation was performed using a fixed dose per fraction of 3.87 Gy while varying the maximum acceptable number of fractions, N
resultsIn the nominal-dose analysis, IMPT achieved a higher N
conclusionsIMPT provides greater isotoxic dose-escalation potential than VMAT for selected patients with large HCC, particularly when impaired baseline liver function causes photon therapy to be limited by mean liver dose. The proton advantage is ultimately constrained by robust GI organ-at-risk tolerances, emphasizing the importance of integrating baseline liver function, liver reserve, and uncertainty-aware serial-organ evaluation into modality selection and treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.