ArticleAlcohol, clinical & experimental research2026
When the Good Outweighs the Bad: Day-Level Interactions Between Positive and Negative Alcohol Consequences and Their Impact on Next-Day Alcohol Cognitions.
Article in Alcohol, clinical & experimental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlcohol consequences are among the most studied predictors of future drinking behavior, yet findings regarding the influence of negative consequences on subsequent alcohol use remain inconsistent. It is possible that the more frequent experience of positive consequences, which are more salient to drinking behavior, outweighs the impact of negative consequences. The current study examined how both domains of alcohol consequences and their co-occurrence influenced next-day evaluations of drinking episodes and subsequent drinking behavior among young adults.
methodEighty-four young adults (Mage = 22.73, SD = 1.54; 56% female at birth) enrolled in an 18-day ecological momentary assessment study. Across 1412 days (578 drinking days), participants completed morning reports assessing prior-day drinking behavior, prior-day positive and negative consequences, and evaluations of the drinking episode. Multilevel models tested indirect associations between alcohol consequences and next-day drinking via subjective evaluations, as well as the interaction between concurrent positive and negative consequences.
resultsExperiencing more positive consequences than usual was associated with more favorable evaluations of the drinking episode, including higher overall positivity ratings (b = 0.23, SE = 0.03, p < 0.001) and greater perceived worth (b = 0.16, SE = 0.02, p < 0.001), whereas greater-than-usual negative consequences predicted less favorable positivity ratings (b = -0.24, SE = 0.05, p < 0.001) and lower worth ratings (b = -0.16, SE = 0.05, p < 0.001). Positive consequences moderated the relation between negative consequences and overall evaluations (b = 0.06, SE = 0.03, p < 0.05), such that the impact of negative consequences on ratings of positivity was attenuated at higher levels of positive consequences. Although no prediction of the likelihood of next-day drinking was observed, more favorable evaluations predicted heavier next-day drinking quantity on drinking days (IRR = 1.22, 95% CI [1.07, 1.38]). Positive consequences also indirectly predicted heavier next-day drinking quantity via more favorable evaluations (b = 0.05, SE = 0.02, p < 0.01).
conclusionsFindings suggest that positive alcohol experiences may buffer the impact of negative consequences, highlighting the importance of subjective evaluations of drinking episodes in shaping subsequent drinking behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.