ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
A study on the current status and associated factors of artificial intelligence literacy among undergraduate nursing students.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The primary objective of this study was to investigate undergraduate nursing students' present level of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy and related issues, as well as to offer resources that nursing educators may use to create focused intervention methods. Methods: From October to December 2025, 389 third-year undergraduate nursing students from three Henan Province universities were enlisted as survey respondents using a convenience sampling technique. A general information questionnaire, the Chinese College Students' AI Literacy Scale, the Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory, and the Creative Mindset Questionnaire were used to gather data. Pearson correlation analysis, theory-driven multiple linear regression analysis, and exploratory indirect-association analysis using PROCESS v4.1 Model 4 were conducted. Results: Undergraduate nursing students' overall AI literacy score was 55.71 ± 7.34. AI literacy showed a positive correlation with both creative mindset ( Conclusion: The average AI literacy score of undergraduate nursing students was 55.71 ± 7.34, with variance across AI literacy characteristics. The important associations of AI literacy with critical thinking disposition and creative growth mindset should be acknowledged in nursing education. AI education should not be limited to knowledge imparting and skill training but should integrate the cultivation of critical evaluation and creative growth beliefs to enhance nursing students' AI literacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.