Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42840278›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in epigenetics and epigenomics2025

Epigenetic mechanisms of plasticity and resistance in glioblastoma: therapeutic targets and implications.

Farzaneh Amirmahani, Saurav Kumar, Sree Deepthi Muthukrishnan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in epigenetics and epigenomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Farzaneh AmirmahaniDepartment of Oncology Science, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Saurav KumarDepartment of Oncology Science, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Sree Deepthi MuthukrishnanDepartment of Oncology Science, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM), a highly aggressive and malignant form of primary adult brain cancer, poses significant therapeutic challenges. Despite our improved understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying tumorigenesis and the evolution of GBM, targeted molecular therapies have failed to improve patient survival outcomes. The failure of standard treatments and targeted therapies is mainly attributed to the acquisition of phenotypic plasticity of tumor cells and GBM stem-like cells. Epigenetic modifications and their mediators have emerged as crucial regulators of phenotypic plasticity, influencing tumor heterogeneity, therapy resistance and disease progression. Here, we summarize and provide insights into epigenetic regulation of GBM plasticity and specifically, focus on the roles played by DNA- and histone modifiers and non-coding RNAs in driving phenotypic plasticity and resistance. We also delve into their dynamics in response to standard therapies and the challenges for targeting them to overcome phenotypic plasticity and resistance in GBM.

Indexed as

DNA methylationepigeneticGBMGBM stem-like cellshistone modificationsnon-coding RNAsphenotypic plasticitytherapeutic resistance

Identifiers

PMID42840278
PMCPMC13639299

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.