Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42840525›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026

Defining imagination: a conceptual mapping and provisional model.

Cassandra Vieten, Julie Eitzen, Chloe Tanega Baxter, Stefanie Holden, Olivia Dance, Corinne Lebrun, Sally Yu, Erik Viirre

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cassandra Vieten *Arthur C. Clarke Center for Human Imagination, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Julie Eitzen *Arthur C. Clarke Center for Human Imagination, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Chloe Tanega Baxter *Arthur C. Clarke Center for Human Imagination, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Stefanie HoldenArthur C. Clarke Center for Human Imagination, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Olivia DanceArthur C. Clarke Center for Human Imagination, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Corinne LebrunArthur C. Clarke Center for Human Imagination, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Sally YuArthur C. Clarke Center for Human Imagination, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Erik ViirreArthur C. Clarke Center for Human Imagination, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Imagination is a central feature of human thought, yet it remains poorly defined and inconsistently conceptualized across disciplines, limiting cumulative progress in research. This paper proposes a provisional conceptual model of imagination aimed at organizing existing terminology and clarifying imagination's structure and role in human cognition. Methods: Using a conceptual review approach, the authors synthesize literature from psychology, neuroscience, philosophy, and related fields, focusing on work that defines, measures, or models imagination. Sources were analyzed to identify recurring components and theoretical perspectives, which were then organized through an iterative process of comparison and integration. Results: The review identifies 60 dimensions of imagination (in addition to eight forms of applied imagination), organizing these literature-derived terms into three overarching domains: cognitive-narrative, sensory-motor, and social-emotional. Building on these domains, the paper advances a conceptual model in which imagination is defined as the capacity to simulate, reconfigure, and extend beyond reality. The model further proposes that imagination operates across varying levels of awareness and interacts dynamically with attention. Discussion: This work positions imagination as an integrated, multifaceted process that is deeply embedded in other core mental functions, including memory, planning, and social understanding, rather than as a separate faculty. By offering a framework and clarifying its underlying structure, this conceptual map provides a foundation for future empirical research and highlights the broad significance of imagination in shaping human experience and behavior.

Indexed as

conceptual mapcreativityimaginationmental imageryvisual imagery

Identifiers

PMID42840525
PMCPMC13639878

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.