ArticlePEC innovation2026
Supporting professionals to talk about remission with people with type 2 diabetes: Using multi-methods to develop a communication guidance resource.
Article in PEC innovation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: People living with type two diabetes can achieve remission through weight loss, and services are available to support this. Our aim was to develop an evidence-informed resource supporting professionals to communicate about remission with diverse people with type 2 diabetes. Methods: We followed a multi-method, four phase approach: (1) evidence review, identifying empirically based communication practices (2) patient and professional interviews, understanding priorities that could facilitate positive conversations about remission (3) triangulation and resource creation, and (4) resource review, including testing with our multidisciplinary team and remission coaches, and final iteration. People with lived experience were involved throughout and we included participants from diverse backgrounds to support relevance and acceptability. Results: The evidence review found framing advice positively and delicately, maximising patient involvement, methods motivating referral uptake were effective. Interviews found staff and patients valued: asking rather than telling, gently introducing remission, understanding an individual's perceptions of success. Triangulating patient and professional responses revealed results were largely complementary, foregrounding Conclusions: Grounded in communication evidence, this resource supports professionals to discuss remission with diverse people with type 2 diabetes. As diabetes remission services expand, this resource needs testing to determine its impact on patient engagement in remission services. Innovation: A multi-method approach informed the development of a communication resource to support effective, inclusive conversations about diabetes remission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.