ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2026
On markers of linguistic impairment in autism and their implementation.
Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Language abilities in autism show considerable variability across linguistic domains: vocabulary, grammar/structural language, and pragmatics (language in context) may be affected to differing degrees and not always simultaneously, as is the case in other neurodevelopmental conditions (NDCs), e.g. Down syndrome, Williams syndrome, or Developmental Language Disorder. This selective review synthesises empirical markers of language impairment across linguistic domains in autism, sometimes in comparison to other NDCs, while also evaluating theoretically driven assessment tools, both established and currently under development, that implement these markers. Core linguistic markers across the autism spectrum include 'social pragmatic' difficulties, i.e. challenges with irony comprehension, referential expression use, and narrative coherence. Impairment in grammar/structural language, such as morphosyntax (e.g., tense marking, passives, relative clauses) and phonology (e.g., consonant clusters, as in str), is observed in a substantial subset of autistic individuals and many other NDCs. Aspects of 'linguistic pragmatics,' such as understanding metaphor and indirect requests, tend to be impaired mainly in autistic individuals who also have structural language difficulties. Other challenges have been reported, including in prosody, semantics and lexical-pragmatics (e.g., mental state terms such as think, fear, happy), but remain underexplored. We further evaluate several existing and emerging screening tools that target specific linguistic markers and accommodate a wide range of populations, including males and females, multilingual speakers, minimally speaking individuals, and those with varying intellectual abilities. Grounded in theoretical linguistics, these tools are designed to facilitate detailed profiling of language strengths and challenges in autism. Their cross-linguistic design and applicability make them well-suited for cross-syndrome comparisons and the development of tailored interventions.
Identifiers
42841965What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.