ReviewBone marrow transplantation2026
Hyperacute Graft-Versus-Host Disease.
Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hyperacute graft-versus-host disease (HA-GVHD) is a fulminant form of acute GVHD that develops early after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, before neutrophil engraftment ensues, and is associated with increased risk of non-relapse mortality. While incidence of HA-GVHD appears to be decreasing owing to in vivo or ex vivo T-cell depletion strategies, it still contributes with life-threatening side effects in the setting of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch or T-cell replete grafts with insufficient immune prophylaxis. Clinically, HA-GVHD presents almost always with severe skin involvement accompanied by fever, rash, diarrhea, and hepatic dysfunction. Differential diagnosis includes engraftment syndrome, adverse drug reactions, immunogenic skin reactions, and infectious exanthems. Therapeutic approaches mirror those prescribed for post-transplant acute GVHD, centered on high-dose systemic corticosteroids. Although there is no consensus on managing corticosteroid-refractory cases, ruxolitinib could be considered the therapy of choice based on data from post-engraftment GVHD. Further studies are needed to assess effectiveness of novel agents in corticosteroid-refractory HA-GVHD. The main purpose of this review is to summarize available literature on pathophysiology, incidence, risk factors, differential diagnosis, and treatment considerations for HA-GVHD. Knowledge gaps, particularly pertaining to use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide and treatment of corticosteroid-refractory HA-GVHD, are emphasized to highlight future research opportunities.
Identifiers
42844292What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.