ArticleCommunications biology2026
Target-dependent routing of sensory information in the olfactory system.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Parallel processing, the ability to split the information content of sensory stimuli and handle them simultaneously, is essential for sensory perception in many systems. Mitral (MCs) and tufted cells (TCs) in the olfactory bulb (OB), with their separate but overlapping projection areas, provide an ideal anatomical basis for parallel processing. Whether they convey different information to distinct areas of the olfactory cortex remains unclear. Here, we separated mouse OB output neurons by innervation area using retrograde tracing from the anterior olfactory nucleus (AON) or the anterior piriform cortex (APC). In vivo 2-photon calcium imaging in the OB revealed projection area-dependent differences, with APC-projecting neurons coding more strongly for odor concentration and more selectively for odor identity. This separation became more pronounced when differentially traced populations were split by cell type, with APC TCs displaying the strongest concentration-dependent changes in response and AON TCs showing very promiscuous odor tuning. Purely cell-type-derived properties did not explain the projection target-dependent differences in odor representation, as both mitral and tufted cells showed similar changes, and SVM classifier analysis demonstrated that classification by projection target outperformed classification by cell type. Our data suggests a prominent projection-defined separation of sensory information in the OB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.