ReviewNature reviews. Endocrinology2026
Glycation and receptors: coming of AGE in the midst of danger.
Review in Nature reviews. Endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The formation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs), first described in food science, is driven by hyperglycaemia (diabetes mellitus) and the modifications on long-lived proteins (natural ageing); AGE formation is enhanced by oxidative stress and inflammation, which are factors that accompany high-AGE settings of diabetes mellitus and ageing. Exogenous tobacco, ultra-processed foods, pollutants and alcohol contribute to AGE formation. Evidence demonstrates higher concentrations of AGEs in the blood and tissues of patients with diabetes mellitus than in samples from healthy control individuals. Despite AGE receptors mediating clearance and detoxification, the production and accumulation of AGEs persist in chronic diseases, facilitating their access to signal transduction receptors, such as receptor for AGE (RAGE). AGE-RAGE interaction accelerates atherosclerosis, diabetic kidney disease and bone, retinal and cardiac disease, as well as other complications. The discovery that the cytoplasmic tail of RAGE interacts with the formin diaphanous 1 sheds light on mechanisms of RAGE signal transduction. Although pharmacological targeting of AGEs has been tested in clinical trials, the lack of statistically significant benefits suggests that AGEs might not be the sole pathogenic species in chronic disease. Indeed, AGEs are members of a family of damage-associated molecular patterns. Hence, in the midst of cellular stress, effective therapeutic strategies seem to require broad approaches to targeting AGEs and their consequences, such as through blockade of AGE-receptor interactions.
Identifiers
42844423What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.