ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
A one-core, four-dimension framework for teaching-management integrated governance in medical universities.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Digital-intelligent transformation is reshaping medical universities, yet teaching and management often remain structurally separated. This paper proposes a theoretically grounded framework for teaching-management integrated governance (TMIG) in medical universities. Main body: Drawing on governance theory, general systems theory, digital-era governance, and medical-education standards, we synthesise a one-core, four-dimension conceptual model and specify three enabling logics. The model centres on virtue-oriented talent cultivation and comprises value and philosophy, organisational structure, data platform, and operational mechanism; the theoretical, practical, and safeguarding logics explain how digital-intelligent technologies can couple teaching and management into an evidence-based governance loop. The synthesis is methodologically explicit: it draws on a targeted search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and policy repositories (2014-2026), applies inclusion criteria focused on digital governance and medical education, and retains approximately 30 anchor works. Conclusion: By treating teaching and management as one governance system, TMIG offers a conceptually grounded path towards the integrated, intelligent, and internationalised digital-education agenda. The analysis is a conceptual synthesis of published work and contains no primary empirical data; the framework is offered as a foundation for later empirical and evaluative research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.