Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42845882›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026

Phase-dependent oscillatory dynamics during needle retention and withdrawal: a comparison of penetrating and non-penetrating acupuncture.

Qian Wu, Dehui Lin, Shanze Wang, Xuesong Liang, Bingxin Wu, Qing Yang, Fangyuan Zhang, Xiuyun Wen, Wenbin Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Qian Wu *Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, China.
Dehui Lin *Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, China.
Shanze Wang *Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, China.
Xuesong LiangDepartment of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, China.
Bingxin WuDepartment of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, China.
Qing YangSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China.
Fangyuan ZhangTraditional Chinese Medicine Department, Foshan Sanshui District People's Hospital, Foshan, China.
Xiuyun WenSchool of Health Science, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wenbin FuDepartment of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical and neuroimaging studies have shown that non-penetrating sham acupuncture can elicit effects comparable to those of verum acupuncture. However, the electrophysiological signatures on the scalp remain unclear. Method: In a 2 × 2 crossover study involving 20 acupuncture-naive college students, we recorded electroencephalography (EEG) during verum and sham acupuncture at Hegu (LI4) to determine whether sham acupuncture evokes scalp electrophysiological activities comparable to verum acupuncture during the needle retention and post-withdrawal phases. Results: Despite eliciting a stronger deqi sensation, verum acupuncture produced scalp electrophysiological responses that closely resembled those evoked by sham acupuncture. Both interventions were associated with a significant increase in theta power in the central region during the needle retention and post-withdrawal phases, a significant increase in beta power in the central region during the needle retention phase, and a widespread reduction in alpha power from the needle retention to the post-withdrawal phase. Nevertheless, sham acupuncture may exert a relatively weaker influence, and the most consistent difference between verum and sham acupuncture concerned the alpha power reduction from the needle retention phase to the post-withdrawal phase. Exploratory correlation analyses indicated that the associations between deqi sensations and scalp EEG power may differ between verum and sham acupuncture. Conclusion: These results indicate that non-penetrating skin touch stimulation at acupoints and the associated sensory attention can trigger electrophysiological activities similar to, though partially weaker than, those of verum acupuncture.

Indexed as

band powerelectroencephalographynon-penetratingnon-specific effectssham acupuncture

Identifiers

PMID42845882
PMCPMC13642567

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.