ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026
Phase-dependent oscillatory dynamics during needle retention and withdrawal: a comparison of penetrating and non-penetrating acupuncture.
Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Clinical and neuroimaging studies have shown that non-penetrating sham acupuncture can elicit effects comparable to those of verum acupuncture. However, the electrophysiological signatures on the scalp remain unclear. Method: In a 2 × 2 crossover study involving 20 acupuncture-naive college students, we recorded electroencephalography (EEG) during verum and sham acupuncture at Hegu (LI4) to determine whether sham acupuncture evokes scalp electrophysiological activities comparable to verum acupuncture during the needle retention and post-withdrawal phases. Results: Despite eliciting a stronger deqi sensation, verum acupuncture produced scalp electrophysiological responses that closely resembled those evoked by sham acupuncture. Both interventions were associated with a significant increase in theta power in the central region during the needle retention and post-withdrawal phases, a significant increase in beta power in the central region during the needle retention phase, and a widespread reduction in alpha power from the needle retention to the post-withdrawal phase. Nevertheless, sham acupuncture may exert a relatively weaker influence, and the most consistent difference between verum and sham acupuncture concerned the alpha power reduction from the needle retention phase to the post-withdrawal phase. Exploratory correlation analyses indicated that the associations between deqi sensations and scalp EEG power may differ between verum and sham acupuncture. Conclusion: These results indicate that non-penetrating skin touch stimulation at acupoints and the associated sensory attention can trigger electrophysiological activities similar to, though partially weaker than, those of verum acupuncture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.