Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42846263›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026

Effects of age in a cognitive-motor dual task: parametric manipulations of cognitive load and motor difficulty.

C M Denaro, J A Monroy, A A Hartley, J Asta, C L Reed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C M DenaroDepartment of Psychological Science, Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, CA, United States.
J A MonroyDepartment of Natural Sciences, Claremont Colleges, Claremont, CA, United States.
A A HartleyDepartment of Psychological Science, Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, CA, United States.
J AstaDepartment of Psychological Science, Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, CA, United States.
C L ReedDepartment of Psychological Science, Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Everyday mobility requires the continuous allocation of limited executive resources between cognitive and motor control. Prioritization theory predicts that biomechanical stability is prioritized as load increases to reduce fall risk. Although dual-task walking has been widely studied, most investigations examine the kinematic effects of a single cognitive task on a single walking condition, providing limited insight into how cognitive-motor interactions evolve as task demands progressively increase. Here we examined how increasing cognitive load and motor difficulty jointly influence gait adaptation in healthy younger and older adults. Methods: Younger ( Results: Increased cognitive load produced declines in Discussion: These findings support capacity-sharing and posture-first accounts of cognitive-motor interaction. In addition to age-related baseline differences, executive function explains additional variance in adaptive gait responses under increasing task demands.

Indexed as

agingcognitive loaddual taskexecutive functionkinematicsmotion capturemotor loadposture prioritization theory

Identifiers

PMID42846263
PMCPMC13642604

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.