ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
Analysis of selected digital risks as a basis for developing digital hygiene strategies. A perspective of vulnerable populations.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid development of digital technologies and widespread Internet access have transformed modern societies, creating new opportunities alongside emerging public health challenges. Digital risks, including problematic Internet and social media use, gaming disorder and problematic gaming, cyberbullying, online sexual risks, online gambling, and cybersecurity threats, may adversely affect psychological wellbeing, social functioning, and quality of life, particularly among vulnerable populations. This narrative review examined selected digital risks and their implications for promoting digital hygiene within public health prevention frameworks. A total of 64 publications published between 2012 and 2026 were included. Relevant literature was identified through PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, supplemented by reference-list searching and selected reports from international and European institutions. Literature was selected purposively, with priority given to systematic reviews, meta-analyses, epidemiological studies, and relevant conceptual and theoretical publications. The evidence was synthesized narratively and thematically, focusing on epidemiology, vulnerable populations, digital risks, risk and protective factors, and public health prevention and policy. The review focused on children and adolescents, older adults, individuals with mental health conditions, and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. The findings indicate that digital risks arise from complex interactions among individual, interpersonal, digital-environmental, and structural factors. Effective prevention therefore requires a multidimensional, socio-ecological approach integrating digital and health literacy, self-regulation, family- and school-based prevention, community support, safer digital environments, and appropriate policy measures. Digital hygiene should be considered an emerging component of public health practice, with further research needed to develop and evaluate population-specific, multilevel interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.