Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42846796›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2026

Blood-based proteomics for schizophrenia: candidate biomarkers for risk assessment and precision psychiatry.

Alexey S Kononikhin, Anna E Bugrova, Arina S Foliforova, Maria I Indeykina, Polina A Strelnikova, Natalia V Zakharova, Anna Y Morozova, George P Kostyuk, Evgeny N Nikolaev

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alexey S KononikhinThe Center for Bio- and Medical Technologies, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia.
Anna E BugrovaThe Center for Bio- and Medical Technologies, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia.
Arina S FoliforovaThe Center for Bio- and Medical Technologies, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia.
Maria I IndeykinaThe Center for Bio- and Medical Technologies, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia.
Polina A StrelnikovaThe Center for Bio- and Medical Technologies, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia.
Natalia V ZakharovaThe Center for Bio- and Medical Technologies, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia.
Anna Y MorozovaMental-Health Clinic No. 1 named after N.A. Alexeev, Moscow, Russia.
George P KostyukMental-Health Clinic No. 1 named after N.A. Alexeev, Moscow, Russia.
Evgeny N NikolaevThe Center for Bio- and Medical Technologies, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schizophrenia (SCZ) is a severe mental disorder where diagnosis remains subjective, and treatment efficacy is limited by high heterogeneity, particularly for negative and cognitive symptoms. There is an urgent need for objective molecular biomarkers, especially for early diagnosis and for identifying individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis. This review analyzes blood proteomic studies in SCZ, CHR states, and related disorders (2019-2025), categorizing them into mass-spectrometry (MS)-based approaches (panoramic and targeted) and affinity-based methods (Olink, SOMAscan). It synthesizes findings from global discovery projects, targeted validation studies, critical risk prediction models, and large-scale Mendelian randomization analyses using UK Biobank data. The field is transitioning from cataloging differentially expressed proteins to identifying causal biomarkers with therapeutic potential (druggability). We propose a consolidated panel of high-priority protein markers, including the ITIH family, CRP, DNER, CTSS, and complement proteins. A critical gap remains in the incomplete coverage of these markers in commercial assays for targeted MS. The future lies in integrating validated proteomic panels with genetic data to enable personalized therapeutic strategies. However, significant hurdles related to reproducibility, cohort heterogeneity, and the lack of standardized validation protocols must be overcome before these biomarkers can be translated into routine clinical practice. Ongoing debates include the choice between MS-based and affinity-based platforms for clinical translation, the interpretation of complement and inflammatory markers as either core pathophysiological drivers or non-specific epiphenomena, and the predictive value of proteomic signatures for psychosis transition. Recent large-scale studies provide a crucial methodological framework, demonstrating the power of rigorous validation and the importance of harmonized, multi-cohort analyses for advancing the field toward clinical implementation.

Indexed as

blood biomarkersclinical high riskmass spectrometryolinkprecision psychiatryproteomicsschizophreniaSOMAscan

Identifiers

PMID42846796
PMCPMC13643384

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.