ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2026
Blood-based proteomics for schizophrenia: candidate biomarkers for risk assessment and precision psychiatry.
Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Schizophrenia (SCZ) is a severe mental disorder where diagnosis remains subjective, and treatment efficacy is limited by high heterogeneity, particularly for negative and cognitive symptoms. There is an urgent need for objective molecular biomarkers, especially for early diagnosis and for identifying individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis. This review analyzes blood proteomic studies in SCZ, CHR states, and related disorders (2019-2025), categorizing them into mass-spectrometry (MS)-based approaches (panoramic and targeted) and affinity-based methods (Olink, SOMAscan). It synthesizes findings from global discovery projects, targeted validation studies, critical risk prediction models, and large-scale Mendelian randomization analyses using UK Biobank data. The field is transitioning from cataloging differentially expressed proteins to identifying causal biomarkers with therapeutic potential (druggability). We propose a consolidated panel of high-priority protein markers, including the ITIH family, CRP, DNER, CTSS, and complement proteins. A critical gap remains in the incomplete coverage of these markers in commercial assays for targeted MS. The future lies in integrating validated proteomic panels with genetic data to enable personalized therapeutic strategies. However, significant hurdles related to reproducibility, cohort heterogeneity, and the lack of standardized validation protocols must be overcome before these biomarkers can be translated into routine clinical practice. Ongoing debates include the choice between MS-based and affinity-based platforms for clinical translation, the interpretation of complement and inflammatory markers as either core pathophysiological drivers or non-specific epiphenomena, and the predictive value of proteomic signatures for psychosis transition. Recent large-scale studies provide a crucial methodological framework, demonstrating the power of rigorous validation and the importance of harmonized, multi-cohort analyses for advancing the field toward clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.