SynthesisJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2026
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Perioperative Muscle Wasting Following Major Abdominal Surgery.
Synthesis in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMuscle wasting in the perioperative period is a frequent and clinically significant complication following major abdominal surgery and is associated with adverse outcomes, including increased postoperative complications, prolonged hospitalisation and worsened mortality. Despite its prevalence, the magnitude and course of perioperative muscle wasting (POMW) remain incompletely understood, and current interventions are limited. Current definitions applied to sarcopenia do not suitably apply to cohorts undergoing major abdominal surgery, and therefore, we propose the concept of POMW, defined as POMW within 6 weeks of surgery. These systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the extent of POMW and synthesise evidence on its clinical impact and potential interventions.
methodsThe electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from their inception to June 2025. Studies with preoperative and postoperative assessments of muscle wasting and/or function within 6 weeks of major abdominal surgery were included. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed with the Revised Cochrane model and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, where appropriate. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model, with standardised mean changes (SMCs) as effect size metrics. The primary outcome was change in skeletal muscle mass/size within 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively, and the secondary outcome was change in muscle strength.
resultsA systematic review identified 45 studies (n = 5283 patients) evaluating perioperative changes in skeletal muscle mass/dimensions and/or function within 6 weeks of major abdominal surgery. A meta-analysis of 17 studies (n = 2213 patients) was conducted, and significant reductions in muscle mass/size were observed at ≤ 2 weeks (SMC = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.19-0.49) and 3-6 weeks postoperatively (SMC = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.24-0.54). Muscle strength, primarily assessed via handgrip dynamometry, also declined significantly (SMC = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.12-1.46). Heterogeneity was high but findings remained robust in sensitivity analyses. Functional impairments and greater muscle wasting were consistently associated with poorer clinical outcomes.
conclusionsPOMW is common, rapid in onset and clinically relevant. Current management strategies are inadequate. There is an urgent need for early identification, standardised monitoring and targeted interventions to prevent postoperative functional decline and improve surgical outcomes. PROSPERO Registration: CRD420250606177.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.