Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42849905›Full record

ReviewOrthopaedic surgery2026

Multidimensional Management of Degenerative Scoliosis: A Comprehensive Narrative Review Integrating Diagnostic Assessment, Surgical Decision-Making, and Patient-Centered Outcomes.

Yaobin Wang, Xingyu Zhao, Kai Wang, Zhenlei Liu, Lei Zhang, Shanhang Jia, He Wang, Weikang Zhang, Yuhua Yang, Tong Xu and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopaedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yaobin WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3311-830X
Xingyu ZhaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Kai WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhenlei LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0827-4420
Lei ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8142-403X
Shanhang JiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1397-1773
He WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Weikang ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yuhua YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Tong XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hao WuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3843-3253

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFC2507703the Beijing Natural Science Foundation Changping Innovation Joint Fund Project L234059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Degenerative scoliosis (DS) is a common spinal deformity in aging populations and an important contributor to low back pain, neurological symptoms, and functional decline. Unlike adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, DS develops in a previously non-scoliotic spine through progressive asymmetric degeneration of the intervertebral disks, facet joints, and supporting spinal structures. Despite its growing clinical burden, management remains heterogeneous, with decision-making often fragmented across radiographic assessment, treatment planning, and postoperative outcome evaluation. Building on previous reviews of DS, this article provides a structured clinical update that organizes contemporary evidence across diagnostic assessment, individualized treatment selection, perioperative risk optimization, and patient-centered outcomes. A narrative literature review was conducted to evaluate current concepts in DS diagnosis, risk stratification, treatment strategies, and patient-centered outcomes. Relevant literature from major biomedical databases was identified and qualitatively synthesized according to clinical relevance. Current evidence supports a comprehensive assessment of DS that integrates deformity morphology, spinopelvic alignment, segmental degeneration, neurological status, bone quality, and patient-specific risk factors. Beyond coronal Cobb angle measurement, advanced imaging and alignment parameters may provide complementary information for phenotyping and treatment planning. The literature increasingly supports individualized treatment selection based on deformity severity, sagittal imbalance, physiological reserve, neurological status, and functional goals, with options ranging from nonoperative care to minimally invasive or more extensive reconstructive procedures. Surgical planning may also incorporate alignment objectives, biomechanical considerations, complication risk, frailty, and patient-reported outcomes. DS management is evolving from deformity correction-centered strategies toward a multidimensional, patient-centered paradigm. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence across diagnostic evaluation, individualized treatment selection, surgical planning, and outcome assessment while recognizing that many management strategies remain supported by heterogeneous evidence and require patient-specific consideration. Future research is needed to refine predictive models, personalized alignment strategies, and emerging technology-assisted approaches.

Indexed as

conservative managementdegenerative scoliosisdiagnostic imagingminimally invasive surgerymultidisciplinary care

Identifiers

PMID42849905
PMCPMC13649347

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.