ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2026
Impact of adjuvant therapy on melanoma-specific survival in elderly patients with high-risk resected melanoma: a multicenter international retrospective study.
Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAdjuvant systemic therapy improves recurrence-free survival in resected high-risk melanoma, but elderly patients remain markedly under-represented in clinical trials; their competing risk of death from other causes needs to be considered. Consequently, the clinical benefit of adjuvant therapy in older populations remains uncertain. We conducted an international real-world study to evaluate survival outcomes of patients aged ≥75 years with resected stage III-IV melanoma managed with adjuvant systemic therapy or observation.
methodsIn this multicenter retrospective cohort study, patients aged ≥75 years with completely resected stage III-IV cutaneous melanoma were identified across 14 international melanoma centers. Patients received either standard adjuvant systemic therapy (anti-programmed cell death protein 1 immunotherapy or BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy) or observation. The primary endpoint were melanoma-specific survival (MSS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included recurrence-free survival (RFS). Survival outcomes were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and evaluated with multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for age, stage, sex, and mutation status.
resultsA total of 580 patients were included (median age 79 years; range, 75-99), of whom 222 (38%) received adjuvant therapy and 358 (62%) underwent observation. Adjuvant therapy was associated with significantly improved MSS, with 5-year MSS of 74% compared with 60% in the observation group (adjusted HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.85; p=0.005), as well as OS (adjusted HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.87; p=0.002). Adjuvant therapy was also associated with improved RFS (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.72; p<0.0001). Among patients managed with observation, disease recurrence occurred in 69%, yet only 47% of those patients received systemic therapy as first-line management of recurrence. Notably, among observation patients who remained recurrence-free or received systemic therapy after recurrence, MSS was comparable to that observed in adjuvant-treated patients (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.25).
conclusionIn this large international real-world cohort of elderly patients with resected melanoma, adjuvant therapy was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in MSS, OS and RFS. Although immunotherapy retained efficacy when administered at recurrence, many elderly patients did not receive systemic therapy as first-line management of recurrence. Adjuvant therapy may therefore represent an important strategy to ensure timely access to effective treatment in carefully selected older patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.