Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42850324›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2026

Mapping the functional dark proteome in cancer.

John R Prensner, William A Freed-Pastor, Jennifer G Abelin, Catherine J Wu, Yifat Merbl, Yitzhak Pilpel, Ton N Schumacher, Jonathan S Weissman, Sebastiaan van Heesch, Reuven Agami

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

John R PrensnerDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. prensner@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7024-636X
William A Freed-PastorDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Jennifer G AbelinThe Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Catherine J WuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Yifat MerblDepartment of Systems Immunology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Yitzhak PilpelDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3200-9344
Ton N SchumacherDivision of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0517-8804
Jonathan S WeissmanHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2445-670X
Sebastiaan van HeeschOncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9593-1980
Reuven AgamiOncode Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2848-2473

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A generation after the genomics revolution, and with the advent of proteomic technologies, the dark proteome now stands as a potential new direction for cancer science and therapeutics. The dark proteome covers a vast terrain of previously undiscovered and uncharacterized protein molecules derived from alternative genomic loci or altered RNA translation. Over the past decade, an unprecedented depth of resolution of the dark proteome has been attained, identifying diverse classes of dark proteins with thousands of members each. Increasingly, individual dark proteins are also being characterized as functional components of cancer cell biology as well as potential therapeutic targets. Therefore, as a whole, the dark proteome offers the possibility to advance cancer science, diagnosis and treatment. Yet, many fundamental questions about the dark proteome remain, including key gaps in knowledge regarding its regulation, contribution to cancer phenotypes and antigenicity, and tractability for clinical-grade therapies. This Perspective outlines the current state of knowledge of the dark proteome in cancer, highlighting critical areas in which further research is needed. Furthermore, it poses guiding questions that illuminate important directions of growth for the field of the cancer dark proteome.

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.